Possum Point
Named in 8 PJM planning documents for 7 projects, from June 5, 2025 to October 6, 2026.
PJM interconnection queue
A PJM queue substation page has the same name: Possum Point (VA) — 18 queue requests filed, 8 active.
Same name and transmission owner. Matched on name and transmission owner: the utility that presented this substation in PJM planning materials is the transmission owner recorded on the queue filings at a substation of the same name. Not verified as the same facility.
Projects naming this substation
Figures are from the most recent document naming each project, as printed. Each links to its page.
| Project | Status as printed | Cost estimate | In-service date | Customer load | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thornburg 500/230kV Substation (Line #568 Ladysmith – Possum Point Cut-In) b4000.351 & b4000.352 |
Not printed | $7.2M | 9/16/2030 | Not printed | 2026-10-06 TEAC |
| Regional Solution: 2025-W1-275 Portfolio b4053.1 |
Not printed | $4832.45 | 6/1/2032 | Not printed | 2026-01-06 TEAC |
| Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis DOM-2023-0016 · s3731 |
Engineering | $27 M | 05/31/2025 | 248.0 MW | 2026-10-06 TEAC |
| Fredericksburg to Possum Corridor – Add 3rd and 4th 230kV Lines DOM-2024-0035 · s3701 |
Conceptual | $180.0M | 06/01/2029 | Not printed | 2025-10-08 TEAC |
| Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental
Equipment Material Condition, Performance and Risk DOM-2025-0026 |
Not printed | Not printed | Not printed | Not printed | 2025-06-05 TEAC |
| Equipment Material Condition, Performance and Risk DOM-2025-0026 Update |
Engineering | $160M | 12/31/2028 | Not printed | 2025-09-09 TEAC |
| Dominion Transmission Zone: Baseline Regional Solution: 2025-W1-275 Portfolio 2025-W1-275 |
Not printed | Not printed | 6/1/2032 | Not printed | 2025-12-08 TEAC |
Changes between documents
Where two documents print different values for the same project. A large change in a cost estimate can reflect a need being combined with others into one solution, not only a re-estimate; read both pages.
| What changed | Printed values | Earlier | Later |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost estimate | $27.0 M → $450.0M | 2025-04-01 | 2026-06-02 |
| Cost estimate | $450.0M → $27 M | 2026-06-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| In-service date | 05/31/2025 → 07/01/2029 | 2025-04-01 | 2026-06-02 |
| In-service date | 07/01/2029 → 05/31/2025 | 2026-06-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Substations named | ALLMAN; ELMONT; FOUR RIVERS; FREDERICKSBURG; KRAKEN; LADYSMITH; LADYSMITH CT; LEES HILL; N DOSWELL; NEW POST; PINEWOOD; RUTHER GLEN; ST JOHNS → ALLMAN; CHANCELLOR; ELMONT; FOUR RIVERS; FREDERICKSBURG; KRAKEN; LADYSMITH; LADYSMITH CT; LEES HILL; N DOSWELL; NEW POST; PINEWOOD; POSSUM POINT; RUTHER GLEN; ST JOHNS; THORNBURG | 2025-04-01 | 2026-06-02 |
| Substations named | ALLMAN; CHANCELLOR; ELMONT; FOUR RIVERS; FREDERICKSBURG; KRAKEN; LADYSMITH; LADYSMITH CT; LEES HILL; N DOSWELL; NEW POST; PINEWOOD; POSSUM POINT; RUTHER GLEN; ST JOHNS; THORNBURG → ALLMAN; ELMONT; FOUR RIVERS; FREDERICKSBURG; KRAKEN; LADYSMITH; LADYSMITH CT; NEW POST; PINEWOOD; POSSUM POINT; RUTHER GLEN; ST JOHNS; THORNBURG | 2026-06-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Cost estimate | $54M → $160M | 2025-07-08 | 2026-10-06 |
| Substations named | CHESTERFIELD; CHICKAHOMINY; LADYSMITH; LANEXA; POSSUM POINT; PROVIDENCE FORGE; TURNER → CHESTERFIELD; LANEXA; PROVIDENCE FORGE; TURNER | 2025-06-05 | 2025-07-08 |
| Substations named | CHESTERFIELD; LANEXA; PROVIDENCE FORGE; TURNER → CHESTERFIELD; CHICKAHOMINY; LANEXA; PROVIDENCE FORGE; TURNER | 2025-07-08 | 2026-10-06 |
| Cost estimate prior value printed on the same page |
$54M → $160M | 2025-09-09 | 2025-09-09 |
Every mention
| Date | Document | Project | What the document says about it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-06 | TEAC Informational Only - Dominion Local Plan Submission of the Supplemental Projects 2026 p. 50 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis | “existing Fredericksburg, Ladysmith, and Possum Point substations” |
| 2026-10-06 | TEAC Item 16 - Reliability Analysis Update - Presentation p. 8 |
Thornburg 500/230kV Substation (Line #568 Ladysmith – Possum Point Cut-In) | No role wording |
| 2026-06-02 | TEAC Item 11 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 9 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis | “split bus configuration at Possum Point” |
| 2026-01-06 | TEAC Item 09 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 39 |
Regional Solution: 2025-W1-275 Portfolio | “Uprate Line 560 terminal equipment at Possum Point substation so as not to limit the conductor rating.” 500kV |
| 2025-12-08 | TEAC Item 11 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 85 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Baseline Regional Solution: 2025-W1-275 Portfolio | “Uprate Line 560 terminal equipment at Possum Point substation so as not to limit the conductor rating.” |
| 2025-10-08 | TEAC Informational Only - Dominion Local Plan Submission of the Supplemental Projects 2025 p. 8 |
Fredericksburg to Possum Corridor – Add 3rd and 4th 230kV Lines | “Reconfigure the 230kV terminals at Possum Point” 230kV |
| 2025-09-09 | TEAC Item 14 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 3 |
Equipment Material Condition, Performance and Risk | No role wording |
| 2025-06-05 | TEAC Item 08 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 4 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Equipment Material Condition, Performance and Risk | No role wording |
* A local-plan posting carries no meeting date; the date shown is when pjm.com last modified the file.
Before relying on any of this
- Names are machine-extracted from PDFs by a language model. Every exported name was checked to be printed in the PDF text; names read only from maps or diagrams are excluded.
- An entry is a name within a transmission zone, not a verified physical facility. The same name in two zones is two entries; spelling variants are merged only when they differ by punctuation, case or a generic suffix such as "Substation".
- role is "new" only where a cited document phrase describes the substation as new or describes constructing it, "existing" where a phrase describes work at it, otherwise "unknown".
- Costs, dates, statuses and loads are the documents' own printed values for the most recent document that names the substation. Each one shipped here is printed on its cited page ("verification": "exact" or "on-page"); values that failed that check are withheld and counted in figures_withheld_unverified. None has been reviewed by a person.
- Zone is the transmission owner whose deck presented the project. PJM-SYSTEM marks names from PJM's own reliability decks, which span zones.
- A printed customer load is the amount a document states for a request. It says nothing about the substation's capability.