Bremo
Named in 9 PJM planning documents for 7 projects, from December 12, 2024 to October 6, 2026.
Also printed as: Bremo Sub
PJM interconnection queue
A PJM queue substation page has the same name: Bremo (VA) — 4 queue requests filed, 3 active.
Same name and transmission owner. Matched on name and transmission owner: the utility that presented this substation in PJM planning materials is the transmission owner recorded on the queue filings at a substation of the same name. Not verified as the same facility.
Projects naming this substation
Figures are from the most recent document naming each project, as printed. Each links to its page.
| Project | Status as printed | Cost estimate | In-service date | Customer load | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominion Transmission Zone: Baseline Charlottesville – Fork Union – Bremo 230 kV b4030.9 |
Not printed | $127.05 M | 6/1/2030 | Not printed | 2025-12-08 TEAC |
| DOM Transmission Zone: Baseline
Bremo to Fork Union 115kV b4031.1 |
Not printed | $7M | 6/1/2030 | Not printed | 2025-12-11 SRRTEP Southern |
| Bremo 138/115kV Transformer #8 | Cancelled | $.092M | 6/1/2029 | Not printed | 2024-12-12 SRRTEP Southern |
| Bremo to Fork Union 115kV | Not printed | $7M | 6/1/2030 | Not printed | 2025-11-13 SRRTEP Southern |
| Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis DOM-2024-0036-DNH (Update) |
Conceptual | $212M | Q4 2031 | Not printed | 2026-10-06 TEAC |
| Equipment Material Condition, Performance and Risk DOM-2026-0019 |
Conceptual | $96M | 07/30/2030 | Not printed | 2026-09-08 TEAC |
| Hopewell – Chesterfield – Basin 230 kV 2025-W1-911 |
Not printed | $113.55 M | 6/1/2030 | Not printed | 2025-11-04 TEAC |
Changes between documents
Where two documents print different values for the same project. A large change in a cost estimate can reflect a need being combined with others into one solution, not only a re-estimate; read both pages.
| What changed | Printed values | Earlier | Later |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substations named | BREMO; FARMVILLE → BREMO; FARMVILLE; FORK UNION | 2026-05-08 | 2026-09-08 |
Every mention
| Date | Document | Project | What the document says about it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-06 | TEAC Item 14 - DOM Supplemental Projects - Presentation p. 6 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis | “Midlothian-Bremo to current 230 kV standards” 230 kV |
| 2026-09-08 | TEAC Item 10 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 8 |
Equipment Material Condition, Performance and Risk | “rebuild the existing #298 transmission line from Farmville to Bremo Substation” |
| 2026-07-07 | TEAC Item 14 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 9 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis | No role wording |
| 2026-05-08 | TEAC Item 09 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 3 |
Equipment Material Condition, Performance and Risk | No role wording |
| 2025-12-11 | SRRTEP Southern Item 03 - SRRTEP South - Reliability Analysis Update p. 4 |
DOM Transmission Zone: Baseline Bremo to Fork Union 115kV | “Upgrade all relevant substation equipment at Bremo substation” |
| 2025-12-08 | TEAC Item 11 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 24 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Baseline Charlottesville – Fork Union – Bremo 230 kV | “Uprate all Line #2193 terminal equipment, line leads, and bus at Bremo substation” 230kV |
| 2025-11-13 | SRRTEP Southern Item 02 - SRRTEP South - Reliability Analysis Update p. 4 |
Bremo to Fork Union 115kV | “Upgrade all relevant substation equipment at Bremo and Fork Union substations” |
| 2025-11-04 | TEAC Item 14 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 33 |
Hopewell – Chesterfield – Basin 230 kV | “Uprate all Line #2193 terminal equipment, line leads, and bus at Fork Union and Bremo substations” 230kV |
| 2024-12-12 | SRRTEP Southern Item 01 - SRRTEP South - Reliability Analysis Update p. 12 |
Bremo 138/115kV Transformer #8 | “Upgrade the 795AAC high side and low side leads as to not limit the Bremo Transformer #8 rating.” 138/115kV |
* A local-plan posting carries no meeting date; the date shown is when pjm.com last modified the file.
Before relying on any of this
- Names are machine-extracted from PDFs by a language model. Every exported name was checked to be printed in the PDF text; names read only from maps or diagrams are excluded.
- An entry is a name within a transmission zone, not a verified physical facility. The same name in two zones is two entries; spelling variants are merged only when they differ by punctuation, case or a generic suffix such as "Substation".
- role is "new" only where a cited document phrase describes the substation as new or describes constructing it, "existing" where a phrase describes work at it, otherwise "unknown".
- Costs, dates, statuses and loads are the documents' own printed values for the most recent document that names the substation. Each one shipped here is printed on its cited page ("verification": "exact" or "on-page"); values that failed that check are withheld and counted in figures_withheld_unverified. None has been reviewed by a person.
- Zone is the transmission owner whose deck presented the project. PJM-SYSTEM marks names from PJM's own reliability decks, which span zones.
- A printed customer load is the amount a document states for a request. It says nothing about the substation's capability.