Joshua Falls
Named in 3 PJM planning documents for 6 projects, from December 3, 2024 to August 4, 2026.
Existingdescribed as
PJM system-widezone
138kV, 765 kV, 765kVkV as printed
7mentions
Projects naming this substation
Figures are from the most recent document naming each project, as printed. Each links to its page.
| Project | Status as printed | Cost estimate | In-service date | Customer load | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-81 b4000.200 |
Not printed | 63.98 M | 12/31/2029 | Not printed | 2025-01-07 TEAC |
| Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-617 b4000.251 |
Not printed | $2.0 M | 6/1/2029 | Not printed | 2025-01-07 TEAC |
| 2024W1 – Regional Cluster Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-820 b4000.355 |
Not printed | $978.76 M | 6/1/2029 | Not printed | 2026-08-04 TEAC |
| 2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: 2024-W1-617 2024-W1-617 |
Not printed | $2.0 M | 6/1/2029 | Not printed | 2024-12-03 TEAC |
| 2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: 2024-W1-81 2024-W1-81 |
Not printed | $137.02 M | 12/31/2029 | Not printed | 2024-12-03 TEAC |
| 2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: 2024-W1-820 2024-W1-820 |
Not printed | $1,055.3 M | 6/1/2029 | Not printed | 2024-12-03 TEAC |
Changes between documents
Where two documents print different values for the same project. A large change in a cost estimate can reflect a need being combined with others into one solution, not only a re-estimate; read both pages.
| What changed | Printed values | Earlier | Later |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost estimate prior value printed on the same page |
$137.02M → 63.98 M | 2025-01-07 | 2025-01-07 |
| Cost estimate | 63.98 M → $4.5 M | 2025-01-07 | 2025-08-05 |
| In-service date | 12/31/2029 → 6/1/2029 | 2025-01-07 | 2025-08-05 |
| Substations named | ALTAVISTA; BROADFORD; CANDLERS MOUNTAIN; CLAYTOR; CLOVERDALE; FIELDALE; GOMINGO; GRASSY HILL; JACKSONS FERRY; JOHNSON MOUNTAIN; JOSHUA FALLS; LEESVILLE; MONEL; MONETA; MUSEVILLE; NEW LONDON; OAK LEVEL; OPOSSUM CREEK; OPPOSUM CREEK; OTTER; REDEYE; REUSENS; ROANOKE; ROCK CASTLE; S CHRISTIANSBURG; SMITH MOUNTAIN; TECH DRIVE; THORNTON → BROADFORD | 2025-01-07 | 2025-08-05 |
| Cost estimate prior value printed on the same page |
$1,055.3 M → $1,109.89M | 2025-01-07 | 2025-01-07 |
| Cost estimate prior value printed on the same page |
$1,109.89M → $978.76 M | 2026-08-04 | 2026-08-04 |
| Cost estimate | $1,109.89M → $978.76 M | 2026-05-08 | 2026-08-04 |
| Substations named | BRISTERS; ELK RUN; JOSHUA FALLS; MEADOWBROOK; VINT HILL; YEAT → BRISTERS; CULPEPER YEAT; CUNNINGHAM; ELK RUN; ELMONT; JOSHUA FALLS; KRAKEN; MEADOWBROOK; MIDLOTHIAN; MORRISVILLE; MOSBY; NOKESVILLE; NORTH ANNA; POSSUM PT; SPOTSYLVANIA; VINT HILL; VONTAY; WISHING STAR; YEAT | 2025-01-07 | 2026-04-07 |
| Substations named | BRISTERS; CULPEPER YEAT; CUNNINGHAM; ELK RUN; ELMONT; JOSHUA FALLS; KRAKEN; MEADOWBROOK; MIDLOTHIAN; MORRISVILLE; MOSBY; NOKESVILLE; NORTH ANNA; POSSUM PT; SPOTSYLVANIA; VINT HILL; VONTAY; WISHING STAR; YEAT → ANDERSON BRANCH; BRISTERS; CULPEPER YEAT; ELK RUN; ELMONT; JOSHUA FALLS; KRAKEN; MEADOWBROOK; MORRISVILLE; MOSBY; NOKESVILLE; POSSUM PT; SPOTSYLVANIA; VINT HILL; VONTAY; WISHING STAR; YEAT | 2026-04-07 | 2026-05-08 |
| Substations named | ANDERSON BRANCH; BRISTERS; CULPEPER YEAT; ELK RUN; ELMONT; JOSHUA FALLS; KRAKEN; MEADOWBROOK; MORRISVILLE; MOSBY; NOKESVILLE; POSSUM PT; SPOTSYLVANIA; VINT HILL; VONTAY; WISHING STAR; YEAT → BRISTERS; CLOVERDALE; ELK RUN; JOSHUA FALLS; MEADOWBROOK; VINT HILL; YEAT | 2026-05-08 | 2026-08-04 |
Every mention
| Date | Document | Project | What the document says about it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-04 | TEAC Item 13 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 32 |
2024W1 – Regional Cluster Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-820 | “Relocate the Joshua Falls 765 kV substation” 765 kV |
| 2025-01-07 | TEAC Item 12 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 61 |
2024W1 – Regional Cluster Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-820 | “Add (2) 765kV breakers at Joshua Falls substation” 765kV |
| 2025-01-07 | TEAC Item 12 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 73 |
Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-81 | “install 2nd 765/138 transformer at Joshua Falls 138kV Station” 138kV |
| 2025-01-07 | TEAC Item 12 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 75 |
Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-617 | “Replace the wave trap and upgrade the relay at Joshua Falls 765kV substation” 765kV |
| 2024-12-03 | TEAC Item 11 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 77 |
2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: 2024-W1-820 | “Substation upgrades at Joshua Falls” |
| 2024-12-03 | TEAC Item 11 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 85 |
2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: 2024-W1-81 | “Replace the station equipment and install 2nd 765/138 transformer at Joshua Falls 138kV Station” 138kV |
| 2024-12-03 | TEAC Item 11 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 87 |
2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: 2024-W1-617 | “Replace the wave trap and upgrade the relay at Joshua Falls 765kV substation” 765kV |
* A local-plan posting carries no meeting date; the date shown is when pjm.com last modified the file.
Before relying on any of this
- Names are machine-extracted from PDFs by a language model. Every exported name was checked to be printed in the PDF text; names read only from maps or diagrams are excluded.
- An entry is a name within a transmission zone, not a verified physical facility. The same name in two zones is two entries; spelling variants are merged only when they differ by punctuation, case or a generic suffix such as "Substation".
- role is "new" only where a cited document phrase describes the substation as new or describes constructing it, "existing" where a phrase describes work at it, otherwise "unknown".
- Costs, dates, statuses and loads are the documents' own printed values for the most recent document that names the substation. Each one shipped here is printed on its cited page ("verification": "exact" or "on-page"); values that failed that check are withheld and counted in figures_withheld_unverified. None has been reviewed by a person.
- Zone is the transmission owner whose deck presented the project. PJM-SYSTEM marks names from PJM's own reliability decks, which span zones.
- A printed customer load is the amount a document states for a request. It says nothing about the substation's capability.