Bristers
Named in 4 PJM planning documents for 5 projects, from December 3, 2024 to August 4, 2026.
Not stateddescribed as
PJM system-widezone
230.kV, 500kVkV as printed
6mentions
Also printed as: Bristers Sub
Projects naming this substation
Figures are from the most recent document naming each project, as printed. Each links to its page.
| Project | Status as printed | Cost estimate | In-service date | Customer load | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJM Selected Solution: Breaker Upgrades b4000.110 |
Not printed | $100.85 M | 6/1/2029 | Not printed | 2025-01-07 TEAC |
| 2024W1 – Regional Cluster Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-820 b4000.355 |
Not printed | $978.76 M | 6/1/2029 | Not printed | 2026-08-04 TEAC |
| Yeat Substation Relocation Update b4000.357 |
Not printed | Not printed | Not printed | Not printed | 2026-02-03 TEAC |
| 2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: Breaker Upgrades | Not printed | $88.09 M | 6/1/2029 | Not printed | 2024-12-03 TEAC |
| 2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: 2024-W1-820 2024-W1-820 |
Not printed | $1,055.3 M | 6/1/2029 | Not printed | 2024-12-03 TEAC |
Changes between documents
Where two documents print different values for the same project. A large change in a cost estimate can reflect a need being combined with others into one solution, not only a re-estimate; read both pages.
| What changed | Printed values | Earlier | Later |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost estimate | $100.85 M → $10.06 M | 2025-01-07 | 2025-04-01 |
| Cost estimate prior value printed on the same page |
$11.5 M → $10.06 M | 2025-04-01 | 2025-04-01 |
| Substations named | ASHBURN; BEAUMEADE; BRADDOCK; BRAMBLETON; BRISTERS; BULL RUN; BUTTERMILK; CABIN RUN; CARSON; CLIFTON; DOUBS; EVERGREEN MILLS; GOOSE CREEK; LADYSMITH; LIBERTY; LOCKRIDGE; LOUDOUN; MARSH RUN; MORRISVILLE; MOSBY; MT STORM; NIMBUS; NIVO 1; NORTH ANNA; PARAGON PARK; PLEASANTVIEW; REMINGTON; ROUNDTABLE; VINT HILL; YARDLEY → DOUBS | 2025-01-07 | 2025-04-01 |
| Cost estimate prior value printed on the same page |
$1,055.3 M → $1,109.89M | 2025-01-07 | 2025-01-07 |
| Cost estimate prior value printed on the same page |
$1,109.89M → $978.76 M | 2026-08-04 | 2026-08-04 |
| Cost estimate | $1,109.89M → $978.76 M | 2026-05-08 | 2026-08-04 |
| Substations named | BRISTERS; ELK RUN; JOSHUA FALLS; MEADOWBROOK; VINT HILL; YEAT → BRISTERS; CULPEPER YEAT; CUNNINGHAM; ELK RUN; ELMONT; JOSHUA FALLS; KRAKEN; MEADOWBROOK; MIDLOTHIAN; MORRISVILLE; MOSBY; NOKESVILLE; NORTH ANNA; POSSUM PT; SPOTSYLVANIA; VINT HILL; VONTAY; WISHING STAR; YEAT | 2025-01-07 | 2026-04-07 |
| Substations named | BRISTERS; CULPEPER YEAT; CUNNINGHAM; ELK RUN; ELMONT; JOSHUA FALLS; KRAKEN; MEADOWBROOK; MIDLOTHIAN; MORRISVILLE; MOSBY; NOKESVILLE; NORTH ANNA; POSSUM PT; SPOTSYLVANIA; VINT HILL; VONTAY; WISHING STAR; YEAT → ANDERSON BRANCH; BRISTERS; CULPEPER YEAT; ELK RUN; ELMONT; JOSHUA FALLS; KRAKEN; MEADOWBROOK; MORRISVILLE; MOSBY; NOKESVILLE; POSSUM PT; SPOTSYLVANIA; VINT HILL; VONTAY; WISHING STAR; YEAT | 2026-04-07 | 2026-05-08 |
| Substations named | ANDERSON BRANCH; BRISTERS; CULPEPER YEAT; ELK RUN; ELMONT; JOSHUA FALLS; KRAKEN; MEADOWBROOK; MORRISVILLE; MOSBY; NOKESVILLE; POSSUM PT; SPOTSYLVANIA; VINT HILL; VONTAY; WISHING STAR; YEAT → BRISTERS; CLOVERDALE; ELK RUN; JOSHUA FALLS; MEADOWBROOK; VINT HILL; YEAT | 2026-05-08 | 2026-08-04 |
Every mention
| Date | Document | Project | What the document says about it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-04 | TEAC Item 13 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 32 |
2024W1 – Regional Cluster Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-820 | No role wording 500kV |
| 2026-02-03 | TEAC Item 13 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 8 |
Yeat Substation Relocation Update | No role wording 500kV |
| 2025-01-07 | TEAC Item 12 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 61 |
2024W1 – Regional Cluster Recommended Solution: 2024-W1-820 | No role wording 500kV |
| 2025-01-07 | TEAC Item 12 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 81 |
PJM Selected Solution: Breaker Upgrades | No role wording 230.kV |
| 2024-12-03 | TEAC Item 11 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 77 |
2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: 2024-W1-820 | No role wording 500kV |
| 2024-12-03 | TEAC Item 11 - Reliability Analysis Update p. 92 |
2024W1 – Regional Cluster Preferred Solution: Breaker Upgrades | No role wording 230.kV |
* A local-plan posting carries no meeting date; the date shown is when pjm.com last modified the file.
Before relying on any of this
- Names are machine-extracted from PDFs by a language model. Every exported name was checked to be printed in the PDF text; names read only from maps or diagrams are excluded.
- An entry is a name within a transmission zone, not a verified physical facility. The same name in two zones is two entries; spelling variants are merged only when they differ by punctuation, case or a generic suffix such as "Substation".
- role is "new" only where a cited document phrase describes the substation as new or describes constructing it, "existing" where a phrase describes work at it, otherwise "unknown".
- Costs, dates, statuses and loads are the documents' own printed values for the most recent document that names the substation. Each one shipped here is printed on its cited page ("verification": "exact" or "on-page"); values that failed that check are withheld and counted in figures_withheld_unverified. None has been reviewed by a person.
- Zone is the transmission owner whose deck presented the project. PJM-SYSTEM marks names from PJM's own reliability decks, which span zones.
- A printed customer load is the amount a document states for a request. It says nothing about the substation's capability.