Ruther Glen
Named in 3 PJM planning documents for 3 projects, from April 1, 2025 to October 6, 2026.
Newdescribed as
DOMzone
230 kV, 230kVkV as printed
6mentions
Described as new: “new 230 kV delivery point (Ruther Glen)” — source, page 22
Also printed as: Ruther Glen Sub · Ruther Glen substation
Projects naming this substation
Figures are from the most recent document naming each project, as printed. Each links to its page.
| Project | Status as printed | Cost estimate | In-service date | Customer load | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis DOM-2023-0016 · s3731 |
Engineering | $27 M | 05/31/2025 | 248.0 MW | 2026-10-06 TEAC |
| Ruther Glen 230kV Delivery - DEV DOM-2024-0012 · s3882 |
Engineering | $47M | 7/1/2027 | 300 MW | 2026-10-06 TEAC |
| Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Operational Flexibility and Efficiency DOM-2024-0051 |
Engineering | $165M | 12/31/2030 | Not printed | 2026-06-02 TEAC |
Changes between documents
Where two documents print different values for the same project. A large change in a cost estimate can reflect a need being combined with others into one solution, not only a re-estimate; read both pages.
| What changed | Printed values | Earlier | Later |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost estimate | $27.0 M → $450.0M | 2025-04-01 | 2026-06-02 |
| Cost estimate | $450.0M → $27 M | 2026-06-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| In-service date | 05/31/2025 → 07/01/2029 | 2025-04-01 | 2026-06-02 |
| In-service date | 07/01/2029 → 05/31/2025 | 2026-06-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Substations named | ALLMAN; ELMONT; FOUR RIVERS; FREDERICKSBURG; KRAKEN; LADYSMITH; LADYSMITH CT; LEES HILL; N DOSWELL; NEW POST; PINEWOOD; RUTHER GLEN; ST JOHNS → ALLMAN; CHANCELLOR; ELMONT; FOUR RIVERS; FREDERICKSBURG; KRAKEN; LADYSMITH; LADYSMITH CT; LEES HILL; N DOSWELL; NEW POST; PINEWOOD; POSSUM POINT; RUTHER GLEN; ST JOHNS; THORNBURG | 2025-04-01 | 2026-06-02 |
| Substations named | ALLMAN; CHANCELLOR; ELMONT; FOUR RIVERS; FREDERICKSBURG; KRAKEN; LADYSMITH; LADYSMITH CT; LEES HILL; N DOSWELL; NEW POST; PINEWOOD; POSSUM POINT; RUTHER GLEN; ST JOHNS; THORNBURG → ALLMAN; ELMONT; FOUR RIVERS; FREDERICKSBURG; KRAKEN; LADYSMITH; LADYSMITH CT; NEW POST; PINEWOOD; POSSUM POINT; RUTHER GLEN; ST JOHNS; THORNBURG | 2026-06-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Cost estimate prior value printed on the same page |
$108M → $165M | 2026-06-02 | 2026-06-02 |
| Cost estimate | Transmission: $108M; Substation: $15M → $165M | 2025-06-05 | 2026-06-02 |
| Cost estimate | $165M → $185M | 2026-06-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Status | conceptual (Conceptual) → engineering (Engineering) | 2025-06-05 | 2026-06-02 |
Every mention
| Date | Document | Project | What the document says about it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-06 | TEAC Informational Only - Dominion Local Plan Submission of the Supplemental Projects 2026 p. 22 |
Ruther Glen 230kV Delivery - DEV | “new 230 kV delivery point (Ruther Glen)” 230 kV |
| 2026-10-06 | TEAC Informational Only - Dominion Local Plan Submission of the Supplemental Projects 2026 p. 51 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis | No role wording 230kV |
| 2026-06-02 | TEAC Item 11 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 13 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Operational Flexibility and Efficiency | No role wording |
| 2026-06-02 | TEAC Item 11 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 9 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis | “extend a double-circuit 230kV to Ruther Glen Sub” 230 kV |
| 2025-04-01 | TEAC Item 11 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 16 |
Dominion Transmission Zone: Supplemental Do No Harm Analysis | “extend a double-circuit 230kV to Ruther Glen Sub” 230kV |
| 2025-04-01 | TEAC Item 11 - DOM Supplemental Projects p. 7 |
Ruther Glen 230kV Delivery - DEV | “new 230 kV delivery point (Ruther Glen)” 230 kV |
* A local-plan posting carries no meeting date; the date shown is when pjm.com last modified the file.
Before relying on any of this
- Names are machine-extracted from PDFs by a language model. Every exported name was checked to be printed in the PDF text; names read only from maps or diagrams are excluded.
- An entry is a name within a transmission zone, not a verified physical facility. The same name in two zones is two entries; spelling variants are merged only when they differ by punctuation, case or a generic suffix such as "Substation".
- role is "new" only where a cited document phrase describes the substation as new or describes constructing it, "existing" where a phrase describes work at it, otherwise "unknown".
- Costs, dates, statuses and loads are the documents' own printed values for the most recent document that names the substation. Each one shipped here is printed on its cited page ("verification": "exact" or "on-page"); values that failed that check are withheld and counted in figures_withheld_unverified. None has been reviewed by a person.
- Zone is the transmission owner whose deck presented the project. PJM-SYSTEM marks names from PJM's own reliability decks, which span zones.
- A printed customer load is the amount a document states for a request. It says nothing about the substation's capability.