Pike County
Named in 3 PJM planning documents for 1 project, from March 4, 2025 to October 6, 2026.
Newdescribed as
AEPzone
765KVkV as printed
3mentions
Described as new: “greenfield Pike County station” — source, page 5
Projects naming this substation
Figures are from the most recent document naming each project, as printed. Each links to its page.
| Project | Status as printed | Cost estimate | In-service date | Customer load | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MISO Tranche 2 Projects AEP-2024-IM018 · s3608.1-7 |
Conceptual | $0M (PJM) | 2032-2034 | Not printed | 2026-10-06 TEAC |
Changes between documents
Where two documents print different values for the same project. A large change in a cost estimate can reflect a need being combined with others into one solution, not only a re-estimate; read both pages.
| What changed | Printed values | Earlier | Later |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost estimate | $173M → $0M (PJM) | 2025-03-04 | 2026-10-06 |
| In-service date | 06/01/2032 → 2032-2034 | 2024-12-03 | 2025-03-04 |
| Substations named | BABCOCK; DRESSER; FAIRBANKS; GREEN ACRES; GREENTOWN; GWYNNEVILLE; HANNA; JEFFERSON; LULU; OLIVE; ROCKPORT; SORENSON; SULLIVAN; TANNERS CREEK; UNIVERSITY PARK → BABCOCK; BATESVILLE; DRESSER; FAIRBANKS; FALL CREEK; GREEN ACRES; GREENTOWN; GWYNNEVILLE; HANNA; JEFFERSON; LULU; MADISON COUNTY; OLIVE; PIKE COUNTY; ROCKPORT; SORENSON; SULLIVAN; SUNNYSIDE; TANNERS CREEK; UNIVERSITY PARK | 2024-12-03 | 2025-03-04 |
| Substations named | BABCOCK; BATESVILLE; DRESSER; FAIRBANKS; FALL CREEK; GREEN ACRES; GREENTOWN; GWYNNEVILLE; HANNA; JEFFERSON; LULU; MADISON COUNTY; OLIVE; PIKE COUNTY; ROCKPORT; SORENSON; SULLIVAN; SUNNYSIDE; TANNERS CREEK; UNIVERSITY PARK → BABCOCK; BATESVILLE; GWYNNEVILLE; MADISON COUNTY; PIKE COUNTY; SORENSON; SULLIVAN | 2025-03-04 | 2026-10-06 |
Every mention
| Date | Document | Project | What the document says about it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07* | SRRTEP Western AEP local plan submission of the supplemental projects for 2026 RTEP p. 5 |
MISO Tranche 2 Projects | “greenfield Pike County station” 765KV |
| 2026-10-06 | TEAC Informational Only - AEP Local Plan Submission of the Supplemental Projects for 2026 p. 6 |
MISO Tranche 2 Projects | “greenfield Pike County station to cut in” |
| 2025-03-04 | TEAC Item 08 - AEP Supplemental Projects p. 4 |
MISO Tranche 2 Projects | “greenfield Pike County station to cut in” |
* A local-plan posting carries no meeting date; the date shown is when pjm.com last modified the file.
Before relying on any of this
- Names are machine-extracted from PDFs by a language model. Every exported name was checked to be printed in the PDF text; names read only from maps or diagrams are excluded.
- An entry is a name within a transmission zone, not a verified physical facility. The same name in two zones is two entries; spelling variants are merged only when they differ by punctuation, case or a generic suffix such as "Substation".
- role is "new" only where a cited document phrase describes the substation as new or describes constructing it, "existing" where a phrase describes work at it, otherwise "unknown".
- Costs, dates, statuses and loads are the documents' own printed values for the most recent document that names the substation. Each one shipped here is printed on its cited page ("verification": "exact" or "on-page"); values that failed that check are withheld and counted in figures_withheld_unverified. None has been reviewed by a person.
- Zone is the transmission owner whose deck presented the project. PJM-SYSTEM marks names from PJM's own reliability decks, which span zones.
- A printed customer load is the amount a document states for a request. It says nothing about the substation's capability.